At 07:41 AM 28/05/02 +0000, Jim Eisele wrote in part:
>Theologism claims that Gen 1 is not presenting history. I reject this
>notion in the most firm manner.
I still don't understand what you mean by "theologism", though I assume
that i fall in that category, since i don't agree with the other two at
all. Also, I have repeated several times that one cannot study Gen.1
separated from Gen.1 -11, separated from the five books of Moses, separated
from the OT, separate from the rest of the Bible.
It is okay with me to stop discussing this, though I have not heard the
answers to my objections, which I will not voice again.
Jan de K.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 28 2002 - 17:28:50 EDT