Vernon Jenkins wrote:
By the way, I gather there is currently some concern about the
> variability of the
> fine structure constant over time.
> Wouldn't you agree that this might well have dire consequences for the basic
> assumptions upon which your idea of truth rests?
I hate to draw this out but cannot forebear noting this as
confirmation of point
6 of my earlier post. If the apparent age argument were convincing,
why would it be
necessary to appeal to claims about the fine structure constant
(which, in any case
wouldn't change 14 x 10^9 years to 6000)?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 26 2002 - 20:19:13 EDT