barrier to concordism)
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 18:40:33 -0000
>Seriously Loren's excellent piece should not be necessary if you looked how
>people studied the bible before 1961.
Michael, you know (hopefully) that I respect your commitment to Biblical
Now, this is the year 2002. We have oodles more knowledge than the
folks did "back in the day." Why not use it to the full force of its
THERE IS SIMPLY A STUNNING SIMILARITY BETWEEN THE CHRONOLOGY OF GEN 1
AND SCIENCE AS WE KNOW IT.
Michael, please don't sell yourself (or our Holy Father) short.
"Coincidences" like this are simply splendid!
Genesis in Question
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 24 2002 - 19:09:46 EDT