Re: What is "natural" anyway?

From: Kamilla Ludwig (
Date: Thu May 16 2002 - 14:03:42 EDT

  • Next message: Kamilla Ludwig: "Re: Some Questions for Kamilla"


    Your response uses fallacious reasoning. I have been careful to use
    natural in a technical sense. Perhaps you missed my explicit
    clarification of the sense in which I use the term?


    On Thu, 16 May 2002 12:25:12 -0400 "Shuan Rose" <> writes:
    > The odd thing about the natural law argument is that two can play
    > that game.
    > Consider the bonobo, close relative of Man. They have been found to
    > engage
    > in casual sex of every description, htero and homosexual. Read about
    > them at
    > In light of this, perhaps Kamilla may want to modify her appeal to
    > what is "
    > natural' as an argument about human sexuality.

    Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
    Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 16 2002 - 23:46:01 EDT