Your response uses fallacious reasoning. I have been careful to use
natural in a technical sense. Perhaps you missed my explicit
clarification of the sense in which I use the term?
On Thu, 16 May 2002 12:25:12 -0400 "Shuan Rose" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> The odd thing about the natural law argument is that two can play
> that game.
> Consider the bonobo, close relative of Man. They have been found to
> in casual sex of every description, htero and homosexual. Read about
> them at
> In light of this, perhaps Kamilla may want to modify her appeal to
> what is "
> natural' as an argument about human sexuality.
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 16 2002 - 23:46:01 EDT