I look forward to your response. However, I may gone on a long trip by
the day after tommorrow.
Jan de Koning wrote:
> At 08:16 PM 07/05/02 -0400, Walter Hicks wrote:
> >A very good subject indeed -- since it involves both modern science
> >capabilities and Christian ethics.
> >Much of the response, I think, may depend upon "Conservative" or
> >"Liberal" values -- rather than upon "Christian ethics" I can see
> >"conservatives" as agreeing for more testing to help humans in medical
> >terms. I can also see "liberals" as arguing for sanctity of life in even
> >laboratory animals.
> >My guess is that it is rather ambiguous with respect to Christian values
> >--- More "political" than moral. I wonder how others look upon this?
> I don't quite agree with you, but I will not have time to reply until day
> after tomorrow.
-- =================================== Walt Hicks <firstname.lastname@example.org>
In any consistent theory, there must exist true but not provable statements. (Godel's Theorem)
You can only find the truth with logic If you have already found the truth without it. (G.K. Chesterton) ===================================
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 08 2002 - 11:36:19 EDT