RE: Black Sea Flood

Date: Fri May 03 2002 - 10:41:04 EDT

  • Next message: gordon brown: "Re: 2900 BC vs. 2350 BC"

    One may not be able to deduce unique conclusions from some writings.
    The main point is that when the truth is know, we realize that the
    writings is consistent with the newly found truth. We cannot answer
    all the important questions that we now have. Leave some for when you
    meet the Lord. The main point is not to be a stumbling block or an
    obstacle for leading people into the Lord. Moorad

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Walter Hicks []
    Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 6:51 AM
    To: Dr. Blake Nelson
    Cc: JW Burgeson;;;
    Subject: Re: Black Sea Flood

    Dr. Blake Nelson wrote:
    > Here is my first disclaimer. I am not saying that
    > Genesis is necessarily untrue in an historical sense.
    > What I am saying is that whether or not every aspect
    > of it is literally true does not matter one fig to
    > Christian faith or the vast majority of church dogma,
    > so we should not get caught up on it as either a
    > stumbling block or something that is necessary to
    > bring into concord for the purpose of apologetics.

    I agree -- but only for a microsecond, of course.

    Walt Hicks <>

    In any consistent theory, there must
    exist true but not provable statements.
    (Godel's Theorem)

    You can only find the truth with logic
    If you have already found the truth
    without it. (G.K. Chesterton)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 03 2002 - 12:03:28 EDT