Michael wrote: "An panentheist god is no god and I can hear lots of good Sci
and Religion types wanting to jump down my throat... ."
If you have studied Griffin's RELIGION AND SCIENTIFIC NATURALISM as well as
Whitehead's 1925 lectures (and possibly other similar sources) and have come
to that conclusion, then let me state I would not think of "jumping."
I have done so and come to a different conclusion than you, but that's OK --
I do not agree with Griffin either -- but to say his model of a god is "no
god" is not, IMHO, correct.
All models of God are, in the last analysis, flawed and incomplete. Some
more than others.
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 02 2002 - 23:43:24 EDT