Many thanks. I was worried in case annyone felt they could be knocked down
if they said something "wrong".
I think the worst kind of concordism is prefereable to YEC and someone
breaking out of YEC might use that as a staging post.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walter Hicks" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Glenn Morton" <email@example.com>
Cc: "Michael Roberts" <firstname.lastname@example.org>; "Jim Eisele"
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: Genesis One and Concordism (was a lot of other things
> I have to apologize to Michael and others. I misread what he said and I
> felt he directed his critism directly at me and singled me out as not
> paret of the "regulars". (Two reasons are 1. Jim and I were the ones
> listed in the "TO" area and 2. alsost all of the attached exchange was
> between Jim and me.)
> Anyhow I was wrong.
> Glenn Morton wrote:
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On
> > >Behalf Of Walter Hicks
> > >Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 2:30 PM
> > >> But if it is a regular e.g. Glenn, Jon. George, Howard etc we can be
> > >> agressive and shoot from the hip. I dont think I could unsettle them
> > >> their faith, but I still need to be reasonably polite. I can be
> > >
> > >I take offense at this! If this is some sort of a club where the elite
> > >have the only opinions that are valid,
> > Let me differ a bit, Walter. I don't think anyone thinks my views are
> > valid, nor do I feel a part of some elite group. I am just someone
> > figure this world out and learn as much as I can about as much as I can
> > along the way.
> > The one criticism that is valid, is that I do shoot--whether from the
> > not is debatable. I love rousing debates in which someone teaches
> > new or makes me better at the subject.
> > glenn
> > see http://www.glenn.morton.btinternet.co.uk/dmd.htm
> > for lots of creation/evolution information
> > anthropology/geology/paleontology/theology\
> > personal stories of struggle
> Walt Hicks <email@example.com>
> In any consistent theory, there must
> exist true but not provable statements.
> (Godel's Theorem)
> You can only find the truth with logic
> If you have already found the truth
> without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 17 2002 - 16:52:14 EST