I have to apologize to Michael and others. I misread what he said and I
felt he directed his critism directly at me and singled me out as not
paret of the "regulars". (Two reasons are 1. Jim and I were the ones
listed in the "TO" area and 2. alsost all of the attached exchange was
between Jim and me.)
Anyhow I was wrong.
Glenn Morton wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On
> >Behalf Of Walter Hicks
> >Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 2:30 PM
> >> But if it is a regular e.g. Glenn, Jon. George, Howard etc we can be more
> >> agressive and shoot from the hip. I dont think I could unsettle them in
> >> their faith, but I still need to be reasonably polite. I can be robust.
> >I take offense at this! If this is some sort of a club where the elite
> >have the only opinions that are valid,
> Let me differ a bit, Walter. I don't think anyone thinks my views are
> valid, nor do I feel a part of some elite group. I am just someone trying to
> figure this world out and learn as much as I can about as much as I can
> along the way.
> The one criticism that is valid, is that I do shoot--whether from the hip or
> not is debatable. I love rousing debates in which someone teaches something
> new or makes me better at the subject.
> see http://www.glenn.morton.btinternet.co.uk/dmd.htm
> for lots of creation/evolution information
> personal stories of struggle
-- =================================== Walt Hicks <firstname.lastname@example.org> In any consistent theory, there must exist true but not provable statements. (Godel's Theorem)
You can only find the truth with logic If you have already found the truth without it. (G.K. Chesterton) ===================================
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 17 2002 - 07:22:29 EST