>From: george murphy [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
>Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 4:46 AM
>To: Glenn Morton
> I think that Glenn has been rather generous about the
>quality of Barnes
>ideas concerning relativity and quantum theory, which can be found
>his book _Physics of the Future_
Since I am not often called 'generous' I will take all examples I can get.
:-) My purpose was not really to critique Barnes but to inform Scott where
who commonsense science was. One thing I left out of my post is that I
looked for any references to young-earth creationism and I couldn't find it.
Apparently commonsense science has no common desire to tell their readers
where they are coming from
> Barnes may have been a nice man (Glenn can speak to that) & he knew
>classical mechanics and E&M. But his work on modern physics was worthless.
Absolutely agree. That is why I always told Tom that he could only persuade
me when he could build a cyclotron without reference to relativity. Barnes
never could. I suspect that Barnes was a big reason Slusher got into that
for lots of creation/evolution information
personal stories of struggle
>George L. Murphy
>"The Science-Theology Interface"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 10 2002 - 09:38:39 EST