RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB

From: Glenn Morton (
Date: Tue Jan 22 2002 - 00:22:36 EST

  • Next message: Michael Roberts: "Re: Flawed anthro views of RTB"

    >-----Original Message-----
    >From: []On
    >Behalf Of Scott Tucker
    >Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:44 PM
    >To: 'Asa@Calvin. Edu'
    >Subject: RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB
    >Just wondering,
    >If believing the sense data was my rule, wouldn't I inclined to _not_
    >believe in the Resurrection?

    Part of believing the sense data is believing the credible reports of
    others. We do this in trials, in science etc. We don't repeat every single
    experiment to be sure that our fellow scientists are not lying. Similarly,
    we have to believe the sense data the disciples experienced, or we have no
    basis for beleiving the resurrection. A guy was visibly dead and then he was
    alive. That conclusion can only be based upon various forms of sense
    data--feeling no pulse, seeing and feeling no breathing, seeing the palid
    skin, etc.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 21 2002 - 16:24:07 EST