Perhaps Michael is implying that those who bought their books were fleeced!
"Howard J. Van Till" wrote:
> A bit of mischievous curiosity leads me to ask a question peripheral to the
> conversation between you and Steve.
> I could not help but note that references to liberal theologians were almost
> always accompanied by the adjective, "wooly." One was given the title of
> "wooliest of wooly."
> Question: Are there, in your estimation, any liberals who are not "wooly"?
> Perhaps "unwooly," "shorn," or "merely fuzzy"?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 12 2002 - 18:13:53 EST