Re: P.J. Bowler book

From: Jonathan Clarke (
Date: Sat Jan 12 2002 - 17:35:23 EST

  • Next message: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: P.J. Bowler book"

    Perhaps Michael is implying that those who bought their books were fleeced!


    "Howard J. Van Till" wrote:

    > Michael,
    > A bit of mischievous curiosity leads me to ask a question peripheral to the
    > conversation between you and Steve.
    > I could not help but note that references to liberal theologians were almost
    > always accompanied by the adjective, "wooly." One was given the title of
    > "wooliest of wooly."
    > Question: Are there, in your estimation, any liberals who are not "wooly"?
    > Perhaps "unwooly," "shorn," or "merely fuzzy"?
    > Howard

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 12 2002 - 18:13:53 EST