Re: Pasteur and nature of science

From: John W Burgeson (
Date: Wed Jan 02 2002 - 11:41:14 EST

  • Next message: Dick Fischer: "Re: Exegesis or Eisegesis?"

    Gordon wrote: "What it conveys is a message that objective truth in
    science is completely illusory."

    FWIW, I do not see Ted's statement conveying that kind of message at all.
     It is more a simple statement of fact. Nothing more than that.

    Gordon also writes: "What eventually overcomes this opposition, when
    the ideas are correct, are the things Ted Davis attacks: observations and

    Again, FWIW, while I don't agree completely with every jot and tittle
    that Ted writes, I certainly do not see him "attacking" in any way.

    John Burgeson (Burgy)
           (science/theology, quantum mechanics, baseball, ethics,
            humor, cars, God's intervention into natural causation, etc.)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 02 2002 - 11:45:32 EST