Howard J. Van Till wrote:
> Rather than tagging them with the "pie in the sky" label I
> would be more inclined to compare them with partially
> assembled jig-saw puzzles -- lots of areas open or with only
> a few pieces in place, with little idea what the details
> will be like in those regions; but the regions that are
> assembled do provide a basis for proposing what the broad
> features of the completed puzzle may eventually look like.
> Some interesting surprises are likely in any case.
> Howard Van Till
Sounds like a fair statement to me. Neither of them are now existing
theories. There is just a belief by some that there can be such a
As in Weinberg's "Dreams of a Final Theory", they are the hopes of
(some) scientists , not bona fide theories which may be subjected to any
sort of validation.
Walt Hicks <email@example.com>
In any consistent theory, there must
exist true but not provable statements.
You can only find the truth with logic
If you have already found the truth
without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 29 2001 - 16:53:09 EST