Re: Science of the Gaps (Re: God acting in creation #4+++)

From: george murphy (gmurphy@raex.com)
Date: Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:53:08 EST

  • Next message: george murphy: "Re: Science of the Gaps (Re: God acting in creation #4+++)"

    Walter Hicks wrote:

    > Well stated, George.
    >
    > How might one obtain copies of PCSF? I can only find a few articles
    > on the web.
    >
    >
    > Walt

            Thanks. The asa homepage (www.asa3.org) has a link to a list of
    libraries that have the journal
    & many articles, including the one I noted below, can be accessed
    through the "Dynamic Directory of PSCF articles." This one is PSCF3-01
    Murphy.html.

    Shalom,

    George

    George L. Murphy
    http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
    "The Science-Theology Interface"

    George murphy wrote:

    >> 1) Scientists qua scientists say nothing at all about how God
    >> acts but only about how natural processes occur within the world.
    >> Speaking about how God does or does not act in relation to those
    >> processes is a matter of theology rather than natural science.
    >> 2) I have not said that suggestions of God's direct action
    >> outside "the limits of the patterns characterizing natural
    >> processes" is invalid but IMO the best theological approach,
    >> consistent with the belief that God's character is revealed most
    >> fully in the cross, is to emphasize that God does, as much as
    >> possible, act withinin those limits. For more detail see my article
    >> "Chiasmic Cosmology and Creation's Functional Integrity" in the
    >> March 2001 PSCF.
    >> 3) Certainty God interacts with the universe. The question at
    >> issue here has been "How?"
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Shalom,
    >>
    >>
    >> George
    >>
    >> George L. Murphy
    >> http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
    >> "The Science-Theology Interface"
    >
    > --
    > ===================================
    > Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
    >
    > In any consistent theory, there must
    > exist true but not provable statements.
    > (Godel's Theorem)
    >
    > You can only find the truth with logic
    > If you have already found the truth
    > without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
    > ===================================
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 23 2001 - 21:52:31 EST