RE: Evolution Statement

Date: Sat Dec 08 2001 - 18:33:53 EST

  • Next message: Moorad Alexanian: "RE: Evolution Statement"

    Moorad wrote:
    >One must distinguish the past evolution of the characteristics of the
    >moon from that of its original creation. Evolutionary theory deals
    >with the appearance of new complex forms of life from simpler ones.

    Pedantic aside:
    There is no good measure of complexity that distinguishes among
    vertebrate forms of life and there is some question that even the
    metazoans can be distinguished without controversy (I think they might).
    On the basis of your suggested criterion -- complexity -- could we put
    you in with the group of scientists that thinks lampreys and humans
    evolved naturally from a common ancestor?

    >The analogous statement for the moon would be to find a simpler moon to
    >which the present more complex moon evolved from.

    That's not the impression I've had reading your posts.
    The actual statement I feel you've been defending is that events which
    happened unobserved in the past are not valid scientific subjects.
    After all, we could never have predicted the specific pattern of craters
    that appear on the moon, let alone whether a moon would have formed
    to orbit the earth. And we certainly can't jump into the "way-back
    machine" and see it all happen again.

    >It is the problem of origins that I strong believe is not a scientific
    >question. Moorad

    I'm aware of your beliefs. But let me ask you something that you
    once considered in an earlier post:

    What role do you think pre-existing religious convictions play in
    forming such a belief about what constitutes "true science"(tm).

    Tim Ikeda

    mail2web - Check your email from the web at .

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 08 2001 - 18:17:58 EST