Dear Hamid Aziz:
I have read your letter below and added my comments therein.
I have posted this letter to Usenet where a discussion is
going on entitled "Relativistic proof of Allah". I invite
you to reply to me there.
In the meanwhile, it is my opinion that religion cannot
stand still, it must move forward. The current international
tension between Christianity and Islam cannot be resolved within
the framework of existing historical dogma. We need a Miracle.
I have proposed that such a Miracle has actually happened,
that a scientific proof of God/Allah has been discovered. It
is my belief that this is the miraculous religious breakthrough
that will allow the universal ecumenical unification of the
world's religions, including a revival of religion in the
Obviously, the Communist Atheistic tradition in Russia and
China will never allow a return of classical religion in those
countries, but it is my hope that a scientific proof of God
will be found acceptable to the Communist world, and will once
again bring the entire body of civilization back into the
unified religious hope of mankind. Obviously, the only hope in
the long run for the Third World is exactly such a miracle. I
am of the opinion that Islam has picked up the scent of such an
impending miracle, and that that is a major factor in the
current situation. That is why I am talking to you.
First of all, don't for one minute think that I am proposing
that I am some kind of a prophet, savior or genius. Obviously
not. In fact, the scientific discovery which I have stumbled
on quite accidentally is in fact based on:
1. 100 years of published Psychometry research.
2. 150 years of published Biology research.
3. 85 years of published Relativity research.
4. 3,000 years of published Theology research.
Obviously then, in the face of that mountainous human effort,
mine is but a small contribution. However, it is vital, because
I am the one who has accidentally stumbled on the unification
of all this mighty research. And that was no accident.
Therefore, I plead with you Sir, not to consider this theory
to be the pipe dream of an amateur, or some overnight hair brained
idea. It is not. It is an absolutely classical, by the book,
traditional hard science discovery.
I have read a few of the articles on your site.
I will study the other articles.
But you might be interested in preliminary comments
Interesting and probably has some truth in it.
Your comment is more sober than those which I have
received from my fellow Christians.
But the writer has assumed a concept of God which is not compatible with
Islam. God is not a perfected man. That is called "Insan Kamil". He would be
a person conscious of God.
This is only a first impression. Let me make it absolutely
clear that my discovery involves no "new definitions of God".
It is in fact nothing more than a scientific explanation, and
therefore scientific proof, of the existing God of Christianity
and Islam. This discovery confirms, in every single detail,
every dogma, every Canon, every Scripture, and every belief of
every existing major religion in the world, bar none. Anyone
who asserts otherwise does not comprehend the scientific discovery
and is therefore mistaken.
Allah is the Creator of the Universe, the self-existing Absolute Reality
before the Universe came into existence.
Correct. Scientifically confirmed.
Yes, it is the Islamic thesis that man was made perfect, but he fell owing
to malfunctions (sins) and is now slowly climbing back. Something happened
in early history which caused this - some kind of natural disaster.
There is no doubt that Sin took an awesome upturn at
some early point in the history of civilization,
probably soon after the widespread circulation of money.
There are 7 heavens and God is beyond these.
These 7 heavens should be
regarded as 7 levels or orders of
existence and correspond to 7 levels of consciousness by which they become
The idea that Gravity is God would be unacceptable. It is, however, a
product of the Will of God.
Again you underestimate the power of what has been
discovered. This discovery recognizes that Physics
does not claim to explain the a priori existence
of reality. For instance Physics cannot define
mass, length and time. Physics can only point to
a Brass Cylinder, Platinum Rod and Cesium Clock,
and ask for a popular vote as to "whether the
majority believes these are specimens of mass, length
and time". All of Physics is based upon that
majority opinion. Physics has never claimed that
it could explain the a priori existence of reality.
Physics can only explain the LAWS of reality, it
cannot explain the a priori existence of reality itself.
Religion on the other hand DOES explain the a priori
existence of reality. It simply says that God created
What I am here to point out, is that Science, just
like it can discover the existence of mass, length and
time, CAN discover the existence of God... and it HAS.
And, this in no way refutes the statement that "God
created Physics, and all the rest of reality".
The interpretation of "miracles" is psychological
but not in the way described by this writer.
This is a good topic for leisurely armchair discussion
after we have established the more basic and central
scientific proposition that is under discussion.
Water is certainly a symbol for consciousness and the ground state of
existence or space-time and the Whale swims in it. The Sun is a symbol for
the source of the light. It is the spirit of God which moved over thewaters
and created light.
Yes, the Prophets are the masters of literary illumination
of the divine and miraculous. They have no peers
in that regard. Even the classical poets wither before them.
Hamid S. Aziz
Read "The Alternative Way" on
-- Be sure to visit my website below ----------------------------------------------------------- George Hammond, M.S. Physics Email: email@example.com Website: http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html -----------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 13 2001 - 20:43:13 EDT