Re: Response to Why YEC posting

Date: Fri Aug 24 2001 - 13:15:47 EDT

  • Next message: Vandergraaf, Chuck: "RE: Response to Why YEC posting"

    David Bowman writes:
    >Regarding Chuck's protest:
    >>Yes, if half lives are not constant but were shorter in the past,
    >>it is conceivable that the 235/238U ratio would have been
    >>sufficiently high 6000 years ago, but this would fly in the face
    >>of physics. ...
    >The possibility of "flying in the face of physics" is no deterrent
    >to the truly committed YEC.

    See the spoof at:

    Funniest phrase:
    "I don't accept fundamental tenets of science and I vote"

    - Tim Ikeda (

    Mail2Web - Check your email from the web at .

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 24 2001 - 13:16:09 EDT