RE: Why YEC?

From: Stephen J. Krogh (
Date: Mon Aug 20 2001 - 12:15:28 EDT

  • Next message: John W Burgeson: "Re: Homosexuality"

    Thus the word, "attempt." I was questioning the letter's authenticity. I
    have heard anecdotes created to support YECism all too often. This letter
    may just be another one suggesting that here is a scientist that found old
    earth views no longer tenable, in the hope to lend credence to this view.
    Stephen J. Krogh, P.G.
    The PanTerra Group

      -----Original Message-----
      From: []On
    Behalf Of george murphy
      Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 6:18 AM
      To: Stephen J. Krogh
      Subject: Re: Why YEC?

      "Stephen J. Krogh" wrote:
        That would be great if you could provide the name to verify that this
    letter is not a hoax, made in an attempt to validate YECism. This is a
    little reminiscent of Harold Hill and the longest day hoax letter.
          Regardless of who the author is, it's hard to see how the "validates"
    anything. The lack of any explanation of why radioactive dating supposedly
    isn't a "scientific fact, provable by scientific methods" and the naive
    assumption about "belieiving early Genesis" that I noted earlier make this
    of little value as anything other than autobiography.


      George L. Murphy
      "The Science-Theology Interface"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 20 2001 - 12:16:03 EDT