"Stephen J. Krogh" wrote:
> That would be great if you could provide the name to verify that this
> letter is not a hoax, made in an attempt to validate YECism. This is a
> little reminiscent of Harold Hill and the longest day hoax letter.
Regardless of who the author is, it's hard to see how the
"validates" anything. The lack of any explanation of why radioactive
dating supposedly isn't a "scientific fact, provable by scientific
methods" and the naive assumption about "belieiving early Genesis" that
I noted earlier make this of little value as anything other than
George L. Murphy
"The Science-Theology Interface"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 20 2001 - 07:17:33 EDT