I kept studying technical journals and books, and finally became
convinced that circular logic and faith in prior beliefs played a strong
part in radio-dating -- in other words, it wasn't a "scientific fact,
provable by scientific methods." There was too much unprovable belief
This seems to be the key sentence explaining why he changed his mind.
However, his argument is loosely framed at best. **HOW** specifically
do circular logic and faith play a strong part in radiocarbon dating?
Unless my science texts are blatant lies (which I doubt), the physics
seem fairly straight-forward to me. Therefore, any scientist dating
some thing should be able to prove his/her statements through scientific
methods. **WHAT** unprovable beliefs does this gentleman think were
involved? I wish his points were more specific. Can the initiator get
this chap involved in the list? I cannot imagine why he would hesitate
to share his name.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 20 2001 - 00:21:32 EDT