I'd like to make a correction. My theory should be
called SPTNCAWHS_eD: SCIENTIFIC PROOF THAT NOBODY
CARES ABOUT WHAT HAMMOND SAYS _ EXCEPT DARRYL :-)
I must concede that Hammonds e-mails have been at
least amusing. However, the signal to noise ratio (in
terms of real scientific content) is insignificant.
Everything for Hammond is evidence of two things: (1)
evidence favoring his SPOG (including the absence of
three-legged dogs), and (2) a worldwide conspiracy of
wicked (or stupid) scientists trying to hide his SPOG
from the rest of the world.
It seems rather strange that you feel bad about
"personal attacks" against Hammond, but you don't say
anything about Hammond attacking other people.
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 18 2001 - 11:31:35 EDT