Cosmic Laws Like Speed of Light Might Be Changing, a Study Finds

From: Moorad Alexanian (alexanian@uncwil.edu)
Date: Thu Aug 16 2001 - 07:24:54 EDT

  • Next message: George Hammond: "There's no 3-legged animal"

    AUG 15, 2001
    Cosmic Laws Like Speed of Light Might Be Changing, a Study Finds
    By JAMES GLANZ and DENNIS OVERBYE

    An international team of astrophysicists has discovered that the basic laws of
    nature as understood today may be changing slightly as the universe ages, a
    surprising finding that could rewrite physics textbooks and challenge
    fundamental assumptions about the workings of the cosmos.

    The researchers used the world's largest single telescope to study the
    behavior of metallic atoms in gas clouds as far away from Earth as 12 billion
    light years. The observations revealed patterns of light absorption that the
    team could not explain without assuming a change in a basic constant of nature
    involving the strength of the attraction between electrically charged
    particles.

    If confirmed, the finding could mean that other constants regarded as
    immutable, like the speed of light, might also have changed over the history
    of the cosmos.

    The work was conducted by scientists in the United States, Australia and
    Britain and was led by Dr. John K. Webb of the University of New South Wales
    in Sydney, Australia. It is to be published on Aug. 27 in the field's most
    prestigious journal, Physical Review Letters.

    Scientists who have examined the paper have not been able to find any obvious
    flaws. But because the consequences for science would be so far-reaching and
    because the differences from the expected measurements are so subtle, many
    scientists are expressing skepticism that the discovery will stand the test of
    time, and say they will wait for independent evidence before deciding whether
    the finding is true.

    On the other hand, the finding would fit with some theorists' new views of the
    universe, particularly the prediction that previously unknown dimensions might
    exist in the fabric of space.

    Even scientists on the project have been deliberately cautious in presenting
    their result. Describing the implications of what his team observed, Dr. Webb
    said, "It's possible that there is a time evolution of the laws of physics."

    Dr. Webb added, "If it's correct, it's the result of a lifetime."

    Dr. Rocky Kolb, an astrophysicist at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
    who was not involved in the work, said the finding could not only force
    revisions in cosmology, the science of how the universe began and later
    evolved, but also add credence to an unproven theory of physics called string
    theory, which predicts that extra dimensions exist.

    "The implication, if it is true, would just be so enormous that it's something
    people should look at and take seriously," Dr. Kolb said. "This would upset
    the apple cart."

    The magnitude of the change apparently observed by the group is minute,
    amounting to just 1 part in 100,000 in a number called the fine structure
    constant over 12 billion years. That constant, also referred to as alpha, is
    defined in terms of more familiar quantities like the speed of light and the
    strength of electronic attractions within atoms.

    But even that small change would rock physics and cosmology, said Dr. Sheldon
    Glashow of Boston University, who received a Nobel Prize in physics in 1979.
    The importance of such a discovery, Dr. Glashow said, would rank "10 on a
    scale of 1 to 10."

    Considering the unexpected nature of the finding, both Dr. Glashow and Dr.
    Kolb said the chances were high that some more mundane explanation for the
    results would turn up.

    Dr. John Bahcall, an astrophysicist at the Institute for Advanced Study in
    Princeton, N.J., said the complicated analysis that was required to infer the
    tiny changes from the observations could in principle, at least be
    obscuring possible errors.

    "The effect does not scream out at you from the data," Dr. Bahcall said. "You
    have to get down on all fours and claw through the details to see such a small
    effect."

    But others said that the team had been very careful and that any unknown
    source of error would have to be extremely subtle to be missed.

    "If they were claiming anything less dramatic, probably most people would find
    their work very careful and believable," said Dr. Massimo Stiavelli, an
    astrophysicist at the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore.

    "Exceptional results deserve extraordinary proof," Dr. Stiavelli said, adding
    that he was reserving judgment until further evidence became available.

    The work relied on observations of light from distant beacons called quasars,
    which shine with a brightness equivalent to billions of suns. The light is
    probably emitted by matter torn from young galaxies by the powerful gravity of
    a black hole.

    Besides Dr. Webb, the team included three other scientists at the University
    of New South Wales, Michael T. Murphy, Dr. Victor V. Flambaum, and Dr.
    Vladimir A. Dzuba; and one physicist at Cambridge University in Britain, Dr.
    John D. Barrow. Three American astronomers who are experts on quasars were
    also members of the team: Dr. Christopher W. Churchill of Pennsylvania State
    University; Dr. Jason X. Prochaska of the Carnegie Observatories; and Dr.
    Arthur M. Wolfe of the University of California at San Diego.

    The observations, made by the 30- foot-wide Keck Telescope on Mauna Kea, in
    Hawaii, looked in detail at the absorption of quasar light by gas clouds in
    deep space between Earth and the quasars. Metal atoms like zinc and aluminum
    are often present in trace amounts in the clouds.

    The absorption of light by such atoms creates dark spikes at various
    wavelengths in the quasar's spectrum, with a pattern so well defined that it
    is often likened to a fingerprint. The value of those wavelengths is directly
    related to the value of the fine structure constant.

    But the fingerprint seemed to change in time, Mr. Murphy said, indicating that
    the constant grows larger as one goes nearer to the present and was not really
    constant.

    "What we have found is that, statistically, there is a difference between the
    fine structure constant a long time ago and here on earth," he said.

    Far from being of interest only in understanding atomic behavior, said Dr.
    Barrow of Cambridge University, the effect would be important "because it
    gives you such a feedback into fundamental physics."

    String theory, for example, could accommodate changes in quantities that
    accepted physics theory considers immutable. String theorists postulate that
    space contains tiny, unseen dimensions. Any change in the size of those
    dimensions much like the expansion of the universe in the space we are
    familiar with could change quantities like the fine structure constant, said
    Dr. Paul Steinhardt, a physicist at Princeton University.

    Dr. Steinhardt said most theorists would have expected those changes to have
    occurred in the first seconds of the universe's life and be virtually
    unobservable by astronomers today. Still, he pointed out that several years
    ago, other astronomers unexpectedly found that the present universe is
    apparently filled with a mysterious kind of energy that counteracts gravity on
    large scales. Perhaps the two effects are somehow related, Dr. Steinhardt
    said.

    Other scientists pointed out that geologic processes, like naturally occurring
    nuclear fission, have been used to determine that the fine structure constant
    has probably changed little over the past two billion years on Earth. But
    researchers on the new paper point out that their results reach back much
    farther in time, and that interpreting the geological results is also a
    complicated matter.

    But a few physicists, like Dr. Jacob D. Bekenstein of Hebrew University in
    Israel, noted that some theories have long been predicting a change in some of
    nature's apparent constants. Dr. Bekenstein called the findings "potentially
    revolutionary" and said he was inclined to believe them.

    "After much thinking about this issue," Dr. Bekenstein said, "I think the
    quasar observations may have found the real variation."

    Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 16 2001 - 07:25:42 EDT