Adrian Teo wrote:
> I can't argue with your point, George, although I would be reluctant
> to accuse Wells of dishonesty so readily.
He seems to be quite willing to imply that textbook writers are
dishonest in their presentations of evolution. But if you're interested
in fine distinctions, note that I said that the procedure, not Wells
himself, was dishonest. There is also no reason to think that I
"readily" move to attributions of dishonesty.
George L. Murphy
"The Science-Theology Interface"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 16 2001 - 13:02:34 EDT