Re: Jonathan Well's Icons of Evolution

From: Jeff Witters (
Date: Tue Apr 10 2001 - 17:44:33 EDT

  • Next message: george murphy: "Re: Jonathan Well's Icons of Evolution"

    >From: Adrian Teo <>
    >Subject: Jonathan Well's Icons of Evolution
    >Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 11:31:01 -0700
    >Jonathan Wells, Senior Fellow of the Discovery Institute, presented
    >so-called Darwin's finches used as examples of speciation was based on
    >extrapolation of data, and in actual fact, the data showed no net
    >evolutionary changes, but rather, minor variations.

    Wells seems to provide a great example of stating the exact truth in such a
    way that the opposite conclusion will be drawn from it. Yes, the hypothesis
    of an adaptive radiation IS an extrapolation. Yes, the finches showed no
    net changes. As the Grant's work from the El Nino event shows, species are
    very mobile within potential character space BUT that net environmental
    stasis in the short term results in "no net changes." Had the Galapogos Is.
    remained under the new climatic regime, then net changes would have
    resulted. Local, short term perturbations in selection pressures (in a very
    simplified system) allow us a window into what would happen when the
    pressure becomes directional (ie,non-stasis trends in selectional pressure).
      Having meticulously revealed the fluidity of character space for the
    Geospizids, the Grants (& others) are well justified in extrapolation from
    their work to the apparent adaptive radation.

    If Wells was simply out to reform science as found in texts, then that would
    be one matter. However, misguided iconoclasty seems to be the game at hand.

    Jeff Witters
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 10 2001 - 17:44:39 EDT