Re: YEC Article

From: John W Burgeson (
Date: Sat Apr 07 2001 - 13:20:26 EDT

  • Next message: gordon brown: "RE: Answersingenesis"

    George wrote:

    " Those who are concerned about ASA being a significant factor in serious
    science-theology discussions should avoid putting anything at all about
    YEC claims, pro or con, in PSCF. The same is true, for that matter, of
    all concordist discussions of Gen.1-3. When many people see these debates
    going on in such a journal at the beginning of the 21st century they
    conclude that the organization which publishes it is hopelessly
    antiquated & not worth being involved with."

    My first reaction was to agree.

    My second one is just the opposite.

    Stephen Gould writes frequently on arguments that falsify YEC. I don't
    see anyone disdaining his writings, or the publications they appear in,
    on that account.

    Like it or not, a YEC view predominates today. Ignoring it is simply
    obscurantism. It is as likely that people, seeing it is not discussed,
    will conclude it is a reputable view as think ASA antiquated by talking
    about it.

    Burgy (John Burgeson)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 07 2001 - 13:31:54 EDT