I'm going to try and shed some light on the discussion between Bryan and
Glenn asserted that academic freedom comes with tenure. That really isn't
true. Tenure in some sense gives total freedom since you can't be fired
(except for gross misconduct). But an important part of university culture
is academic freedom for *all* faculty, tenured or not. The expectation is
that non-tenured faculty will express themselves freely. In practice, there
is a bit more constraint on non-tenured faculty, because if they anger others
they are less likely to get tenure when the time comes for that decision.
But in general somebody in Dembski's *faculty* position would have every
right to be disagreeable with others.
I emphasized *faculty* position because administrative posts are different.
No professor, tenured or otherwise, will lose his faculty position for saying
something unwise or unpopular. But positions like Deans and Department
Chairs and Directors of Centers (like Dembski was) don't have this
protection. It is there that one is expected to obey the boss, be properly
diplomatic, etc., and one can be removed from those jobs pretty much at the
whim of the bosses. And one is likely to be removed if one can't get along
with others or if one isn't properly deferential to one's superiors.
So Dembski's removal from his *Director* position for his publicly snotty
comments was to be expected. It is no threat to academic freedom because (as
explained in the message from Michael Beaty that Glenn posted yesterday) he
retains his faculty position and can continue to pursue his academic work.
If they had also canned Dembski from his faculty position, then Bryan's worry
about academic freedom would be justified, and there might be a case for
The one factor that I'm not sure about in this is whether there are special
considerations at Baylor because it is a Christian institution. I know that
Baylor faculty have to agree to a statement of faith. I wonder if there is
also a faculty code of conduct? If he agreed to behave in a graceful
Christian manner toward his brothers and sisters on the faculty, then he
might be in violation of that.
Finally, I wonder if Bryan can give some specifics of the "harsh attacks"
from Baylor faculty on Dembski he mentioned. In particular, I wonder if they
were personal attacks on Dembski's character (like Dembski's characterization
of the faculty who opposed the Center as "dogmatic" and "intolerant") or if
they were harsh things said about Dembski's *work*. That is an important
distinction (which we've discussed in the past with regard to the personal
judgments Phil Johnson has been making on Christian scientists who disagree
Allan Harvey, email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 01 2000 - 10:39:24 EST