What About Carl Baugh?
A Commentary by Answers in Genesis
Note the confusion about the plesiosaurus and the Paluxy trails.
"Evolutionism was being destroyed by the Paluxy trail's reality, so the
Evolutionarians had to find another excuse
or two to deflect the rational conclusion that dinosaurs and human beings had
been living at the same time in
history, just as the Bible teaches. Nearly ten years after the trail's
discovery was made public, the PBS program
NOVA found some poor deluded "scientist" who was willing to say on the air
that the human footprints were
caused a dinosaur walking ON ITS HEELS! Apparently many of his colleagues
must have had the same reaction
because new rationalization quickly followed his pathetic comedy act. The
latest bumbling "scientific" attempt at
dismissing the trail's evidence is the ridiculous assertion that the prints
were made by a "new" species of dinosaur.
Again Evolutionism's faithful have ignored the evidence. The fossilized
prints CLEARLY show a human foot
structure with FIVE toes: four small toes, and the great toe. Dinosaurs have
a total of FOUR toes! They best
CLEARLY show the imprint of a human arch, heel and the base of the
metatarsals (the middle bones of a foot).
Even in the face of this overwhelming evidence, Evolutionism's "scientists"
insist it is IMPOSSIBLE for humans
and dinosaurs to have existed together, so the human prints MUST be dinosaur
prints ... just ignore the five toes
and they won't present a problem! "
And the plesiosaurus
"Evolutionarians say that dinosaurs are extinct with great confidence in the
overwhelming superiority of their faith.
The real requirements, however, for proving that dinosaurs are truly extinct
are: (1) ignore the Japanese
plesiosaurus and the Coelacanth, and (2) place every square inch of the earth
under surveillance at the exact same
moment! Then, if no dinosaurs are seen, they must be extinct. Of course, the
Japanese plesiousaurus carcass does
put a bit of a "kink" in their argument. "
The plesiosaurus is now known to be a shark.
Why is such bad science still promulgated on the web I wonder?
It makes me sad as a scientist and a Christian to see such bad science in
name of Christian faith. I am deeply ashamed when seeing such IMHO misguided
mixing of science and faith, especially when the "science" is not just
misguided but demonstrably erroneous and misleading.
Oh yes some more dissertation work from our friend
The Burdick print
"here are specific reasons for placing Dr. Baugh's Doctoral Dissertation on
our web site. The initial reason is to demonstrate the validity of his
credentials as holding an earned Ph.D. degree which was accredited by a
state agency. The quality of the work has been verified by various
independent scholars. "
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 18:37:18 EDT