From: William T. Yates (
Date: Thu Sep 21 2000 - 16:44:27 EDT

  • Next message: "Re: Random processes create meaning"


    I was stunned recently to discover that several people in my church (an
    independent Reformed Baptist church) believed in geocentricity!
    Otherwise normal, rational, and very nice people, I believe they have
    been suckered into taking some Biblical references literally and not
    figuratively. They are aided in this mistake by the Biblical Astronomer
    site of Dr. Gerardus Buow.

    I have read his material and as well as I can decipher it, he claims to
    have a solution for the apparent rotation and revolution of the Earth.
    There is a response to these claims on TalkOrigins by E. T. Babinski and
    a theological response posted on the web by Bernard E. Northrup, Th.D.

    What I am looking for are arguments, both scientific and theological,
    which will, to the best extent possible, refute the arguments of
    'modern' geocentricity. Some of the best scientific arguments against
    geocentricity are the superluminal velocities of almost everything in
    the universe required to have them rotate the Earth every 24 hours; the
    variations in the length of the day caused by earthquakes (how would an
    earthquake affect the rest of the universe?); and the latitudinal
    variation in the diurnal aberration of starlight, that is, the apparaent
    displacement of star postions caused by the speed of the Earth's
    rotation, which varies from the equator to the poles. Can anyone think
    of others?

    I know these people are sincere in their desire to honor the Word of
    God, but it seems they have strained at a gnat and swallowed a camel.


    --Bill Yates

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 21 2000 - 16:43:28 EDT