Re: A neat syllogism

Adam Crowl (
Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:09:56 PST


>From: Moorad Alexanian <>
>Subject: Re: A neat syllogism
>Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 08:54:57 -0500
>My objection to the first syllogism is that it places God in our space-time
>when its says that "God created life." God creates life constantly. The
>that govern the physical universe have no power to create life, God is the
>sole possessor of that authority. Since I do not know what to be alive
>means, and I think most also do not, I believe this second syllogism is
>somewhat restrictive.
How can you say "God creates life constantly. " and then say matter/physics
can't??? It doesn't make any sense... since all Life as we know it is based
on those Laws and is quite able to make itself!


Get Your Private, Free Email at