>>What I like about ID is that it does support design of the universe
which I agree. What I dislike and dislike strongly, is the avoidance of
scenario about earth history. That is the game the historical sciences
playing--the determination of what actually happened in the past--and ID
isn't even on the playing field having forfeited to the other side.
To me this avoidance of a scenario that works in the ID movement is a
failure of courage on their part--they can never be proven wrong if they
don't propose anything with future observational implications.>>
You are using the term "ID" to refer to people, and, if I agree to that
definition, I will agree. I was using the term "ID" to refer to a
concept. If you agree to that definition, I perceive you and I agreeing.
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.