What I like about ID is that it does support design of the universe with
which I agree. What I dislike and dislike strongly, is the avoidance of any
scenario about earth history. That is the game the historical sciences are
playing--the determination of what actually happened in the past--and ID
isn't even on the playing field having forfeited to the other side.
To me this avoidance of a scenario that works in the ID movement is a
failure of courage on their part--they can never be proven wrong if they
don't propose anything with future observational implications.
Foundation, Fall and Flood
Adam, Apes and Anthropology
Lots of information on creation/evolution