RE: Year of Destiny?!

Pim van Meurs (
Mon, 6 Sep 1999 12:40:49 -0700

Yes, Vernon still has to show that the data are not due to randomness for instance.

From: Vandergraaf, Chuck[]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 1999 8:11 PM
To: ''
Subject: RE: Year of Destiny?!


I didn't look through all the attachments, but isn't this some sort of
numerology? Also, I snipped the following statement out of the first
attachment: "it will be a leap year - and will thus include an extra month."
With nonsense like that, I wouldn't put too much stock in these

Let's live everyday as if the Lord would appear that same day.

Chuck Vandergraaf
Pinawa, MB
> ----------
> From: Vernon Jenkins[]
> Reply To:
> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 1999 5:41 PM
> To:;
> Subject: Year of Destiny?!
> <<File: Segment1_5760.htm>><<File: Mystery_5760_2.gif>><<File:
> Segment2_5760.htm>><<File: Chequers.gif>><<File:
> Segment3_5760.htm>><<File: Mystery_5760_3.gif>><<File:
> Segment4_5760.htm>><<File: Mystery_5760_4.gif>><<File: Segment5_5760.htm>>
> Friends,
> We are rapidly approaching a significant conjunction in world history.
> By a remarkable coincidence(?)a unique Anno Mundi (according to the
> Jewish calendar) will overlap a rather special Anno Domini.
> I have appended the details.
> Vernon

<<File: ATT00001.html>>