Re: re-whales from rodents
Mon, 16 Aug 1999 17:44:58 +0000
At 08:31 AM 08/16/1999 -0600, Allan Harvey wrote:
>At 01:53 PM 8/15/99 +0000, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>>At 07:50 AM 08/15/1999 -0600, John W. Burgeson wrote:
>>>3. Simply pointing out that your claim is without merit.
>>Well, my friend, we will have to agree to disagree about this one. And
>>aparently even some who normally are not fond of my ideas here agree with
>>me on this one.
>You know, I think I see where Glenn and Burgy have been talking past each
>other on this one.
>Glenn, you didn't really mean to say that Phil Johnson *himself believes*
>that whales evolved from rodents, did you? (I think Burgy took you
>overly literally there) Isn't what you really meant to say something like:
>"Phil Johnson believes that evolutionary theory has whales evolving from
>so that your claim was about his ignorance of evolutionary theory?
>Burgy, given that Glenn was a little sloppy in his wording in pointing
>out PJ's misconceptions about evolutionary theory, can you agrtee with
>what Glenn must have meant, namely that, from Johnson's writings, it does
>look like he is claiming that this is a part of standard Darwinsim?
Yeah, that is what I mean. Obviously since Johsnon isn't an evolutionist,
he himself doesn't believe rodents gave rise to whales.
>Allan (thinking he should start a mediation service)
Might make more money than a government scientist. ":-)
Foundation, Fall and Flood
Adam, Apes and Anthropology
Lots of information on creation/evolution