From: George Murphy <email@example.com>
To: Moorad Alexanian <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>; email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Wednesday, August 11, 1999 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: Inconsistency on Shroud vs. Genesis.
>Moorad Alexanian wrote:
>> I think the scientific study of the Shroud is good science and should be
>> encouraged. If there is no scientific explanation on how the image got
>> the cloth, then there may be an explanation which lies outside science.
>> After all there has never been an event of a cloth surrounding a dead
>> and leaving a mark on it on resurrection. Then we can speak of whether
>> body was Christ's or not.
> OK. But it also is not _de fide_ that something beyond the capabilities
>of natural processes happened _to the shroud_ when Jesus was raised. So
>& its image itself might be quite "natural" while providing strong evidence
>crucifixion & rather weaker evidence that something unusual happened to his
>George L. Murphy