>The argument against Christians using the notion of "supernatural"
>that I have heard, is that supernatural is not a biblical concept.
>The argument says that because the bible doesn't distinguish between
>natural and supernatural, neither should we. Now I don't feel
>comfortable with this. I feel that logically there really is a
>difference between the natual and supernatural. Yet I'm not sure what
>to make of this argument about supernatural not being biblical. Any
The distinction that you make between things that occur normally and things
that require invoking God for adequate description is biblical. Pharaoh's
magicians recognized the plagues as supernatural (Ex. 8:19), Mary (Lk.
1:34) and Joseph (Mt. 1:19) knew that virgins do not get pregnant