Considering that one can not or does not generally ask for forgiveness for
the mistake of others, I find your reading to be strange. Also the next
"I'm not sure how I missed it in the proofing stages, ..."
Since Hugh doesn't proof read Science News (to my knowledge) I still think
he is correcting one of his goof-ups. But I find that to be a good thing.
><<I applaud Hugh for his public retraction of erroneous data.>>
>Agreed. Retraction of erroneous data enhances credibility.
And why Christian apologetical ministries find it to be so difficult to
correct errors is beyond me. I am glad Hugh took the steps he did.
Adam, Apes and Anthropology
Foundation, Fall and Flood
& lots of creation/evolution information