Yes, I suppose it could be both. I actually lean toward con man on this
one, unlike his buddy Kent Hovind, who I think actually believes the
nonsense he shovels out. Hovind just regurgitates what he reads from
someone else and he can't be bothered with reality; Wyatt actively
invents new and more absurd claims. Wyatt just goes to too much trouble
to justify concealing all of the "evidence" that he claims he has. I
think that gives away the game as far as he is concerned.