Re: Methodological naturalism

George Murphy (gmurphy@raex.com)
Thu, 26 Mar 1998 17:58:56 -0500

Moorad Alexanian wrote:

> Any legitimate form of scientific inquiry relies on experimental science. I
> do not see how you can circumvent the statement of Laplace that experimental
> science has no need for God. So long as the data collected by the
> experimenter is done by mechanical apparatus---whose function is governed by
> physical laws--then the statement made by Laplace is almost a tautology.

I agree, & would add that this is true for both experimental &
theoretical science. Whatever Laplace's beliefs were, his statement
that he "did not need that hypothesis [of God]" is a correct statement
about the way science _qua_ science functions. Christian belief may, of
course, serve as a motivation for doing science - but so may a lot of
other things.
George

-- 
George L. Murphy
gmurphy@imperium.net
http://www.imperium.net/~gmurphy