>X-Authentication-Warning: maxwell.kumo.com: major-ii set sender to
firstname.lastname@example.org using -f
>Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 00:08:45 -0500
>From: "John Catalano" <email@example.com>
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I)
>To: MAILING LIST for the World of Richard Dawkins <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Subject: Dawkins: Dawkins & Polly Toynbee / Dawkins & Michael Poole / 4
new featured links
>HEADLINES: ( http://www.spacelab.net/~catalj/#topnews )
>I found this recently while searching the web. An exchange from "The
>Independent", 20 and 24 February 1997:
>** The nature of our DNA will always lag behind nurture: Gene testing is
>pointless. Our fates are more likely to be shaped by our postcodes by
>** A response: What your genes reveal about you: Nature and nurture is
>not an either/or issue by Richard Dawkins
>These articles were just posted by "Christian Students in Science" (CSIS
>http://www.csis.org.uk/), and originally published in "Science and
>Christian Belief" in Vol 6 (April 1994) and Vol 7 (1995)
>An exchange between Michael Poole and Richard Dawkins...
>** A Critique of Aspects of the Philosophy and Theology of Richard
>Dawkins by Michael Poole, Visiting Research Fellow at King's College,
>** A Reply to Poole by Richard Dawkins:
>** A Response to Dawkins by Michael Poole:
>Four NEW FEATURED LINKS:
>( see http://www.spacelab.net/~catalj/home.html#featured )
>1) "Artificial Life" - a wonderful hypertext introduction by Thomas Ray,
>the creator of Tierra.
>2) SoftBlocks - an interesting new simulation language, ideal for
>developing artificial life applications. One app is described - ZedLand
>3) KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
>4) Creation 'Science' Debunked by Lenny Flank
>I reformatted these pages to be easier to read and select:
>"Online Papers and Commentary by Dawkins"
>"Online Interviews and Articles about Dawkins"
>I apologize that my homepage has become very bloated and slow to load.
>When I get my new (much faster) PC, all the pages will be split off and
>the site redone using FrontPage 98.
>John Catalano + email@example.com + New York, USA
>"The World of Richard Dawkins" + http://www.spacelab.net/~catalj
>ps. Especially note this excerpt from one of the articles above
>"Without getting into the notorious problems of defining intelligence,
>we can prove to ourselves that, in a powerfully predictive sense, there
>have been genes for intelligence for millions of years of human history.
>All you must assume is that, by whatever definition you are prepared to
>accept, we are more intelligent than our ape ancestors. Certainly our
>brains are spectacularly bigger than our fossil ancestors'. Right then,
>how has that evolutionary change come about?
>There is only one way: genes for intelligence (or whatever you want to
>call the qualities that separate us from our ancestors) have been
>favoured in the gene pool. No evolutionary change in X can take place
>unless there are genes for X varying in the population. It follows that,
>during the millions of years in which we have been pulling ahead of our
>ape ancestors, some of us have been brighter than others, and it has
>been predictable from our genes. To deny that, you must deny
Dr R.C.J. Carling, Senior Commissioning Editor Science
National Publishing, The Stationery Office
St Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich NR3 1PD
Tel: 01703 778830 Tel: 01603 69 4918
Fax modem: 01703 342838 Fax: 01603 69 6768