Re: > Re: Defining GOG & EOG

Bill Payne (
Sat, 20 Dec 1997 22:19:13 -0600

Wed, 17 Dec 1997 16:07:55 -0600 Glenn Morton wrote:

> I see lots of anti-evolutionists
> take this stand on truth--ie scientific truth is less than theological truth
> (and by theological truth I mean the INDIVIDUAL's interpretation of the
> bible).

"Who do you say that I am?" Simon Peter answered, "You are the Christ,
the Son of the living God." Jesus replied, "...this was not revealed to
you by man, but by my Father in Heaven." (Matthew 16:16-17)
Scientifically, Jesus was just a man; theologically (God's
interpretation) He was "the Son of the living God."

> While it appears that you believe in evolution, many people who
> don't believe in evolution take a similar stand on truth. And to me, this
> stand on truth is probably at the core of the creation/evolution debate and
> is the reason that anti-evolutionists pay no attention to factual data.

Excuse me ....... hellllllllo? Anti-evolutionist here. I do pay
attention to factual (and non-factual?) data, I just happen to believe
that there may be an alternate interpretation to yours.