>What can you tell us about whether or not Miklos, Gerhart, Kirschner, or
>Raff are still evolutionists in spite of their rejection of the
All are still evolutionists.
>I appreciate your point as it contributes to the present discussion, but I
>must say that I find the enlistment of the work of these folks (and other
>evo-devo types) into the ID supporting evidences (as you and Phil and
>others often do) as nefarious as the enlistment of the work of punctuated
>equilibriumists into the young earth creationist supporting evidences.
Then maybe you can show me where, in my post entitled "Speciation and
Macroevolution," I enlisted Miklos, Kirschner, Gerhart, or anyone
else in support of ID. I had thought I was addressing the bearing
of speciation on macroevolution.