>That figure you use of 10^94. We don't know that these will function just
>fine (to say nothing of dandy) at all. We only know of a few thousand that
>will function just fine in specific organisms and one or a handful that
>will function just fine in man. The others are just hypothetically
>conceivable, but untested. Probably most would not work in man, So your
>point is weak.
What Yockey did was substitute hydrophobics for hydrophobics, hydrophyllics
for hydrophyllics. These are unlikely to alter function. Then he calculated
the useful ones.
Foundation, Fall and Flood