Re: Reply to Dean
Fri, 23 Aug 1996 09:22:18 -0400

Burgy writes:

>How fortunate, then, for the barber profession that he did not also read=

>Lev 19:27.
>How fortunate for the children of that city that he did not also read Le=
v =

>20:9. Etc.

These examples bring up a question in my mind. Most of us would =

agree that many of the laws in Lev. 19 are pass=E9, whereas most of the l=
aws =

in Lev. 20 would still be considered valid for today. What criteria may =
we =

use to establish whether or not a given OT law should be retained or thro=
wn =


Mike Jaqua
7245 Balfour Drive
Kalamazoo, MI 49024
(616) 327-6570 =