I've had some concerns about inferring religion from ancient artifacts ever
since I first heard one of Hugh Ross' talks in which he claimed no evidence
of religion more than ~50000 years ago. A statue of a nude woman may only
indicate a race of hominids that has the symbolic capabilites needed to
appreciate art. Of course such capabilities are important in the
expression of religious belief, but I think it's a stretch to infer that
they _demonstrate_ the presence of religion. If we knew there was no art
before a certain date, then I believe we would be justified in inferring
there was no religion prior to that date. But to then infer that there was
religion beginning from that date is stretching things.
>As an aside I might add that in my theology, human beings aren't the only
>creatures with religious sensibilities. "The heavens declare the glory of
>God..." "They look to Him for food..."
Interesting. Reminds me of my claim that God commands and nature
(worshipfully perhaps?) obeys.
Bill Hamilton | Chassis & Vehicle Systems
GM R&D Center | Warren, MI 48090-9055
810 986 1474 (voice) | 810 986 3003 (FAX)
email@example.com (office) | firstname.lastname@example.org (home)