> I also have to admit that the idea of God making man by
>resurrecting the miscarriage of an ape repels me. I much prefer Roy
>Clouser's revelation approach, albeit it explicialy allows for a
> continuing presence of non_Adamites.
Can you describe Clouser's revelation approach? Thanks. However...
Never one to let a criticism go by :-) I would ask which is more
1. Being evolved from an ape with no Adam and Eve and the possibility that
there was no Fall and thus no redemption?
2. Having a God who goes out of his way to create the appearance of a
relationship to the ape (the pseudogenes I spoke of a couple of days ago)
when in fact we are not related to the ape? This, of course, raises the
possibility that God can not be trusted!
3. What I have suggested?
Foundation,Fall and Flood