Thanks for the lesson on "Son of man".
>The short answer is that the source of biological man is in the
>domain of science, while covenant man is in the hands of theologians.
>Biologists and anthropologists can look in Africa and can go back in
>time over 4 million years if they like. It has no impact on biblical
>authority or integrity because Adam of Genesis entered a populated
>world. And this was known by the OT authors.
By isolating Adam the theological creature from Adam the biological
creature, IMO we make the Scripture irrelevant to reality. If I have no
evidence for this separate event, how can I know it happened?
Foundation,Fall and Flood