Re: The recent ID discussion
John W. Burgeson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Fri, 10 Oct 1997 21:31:20 EDT
George Murphy wrote: "I simply note that the ID argument (as personified
by PJ, O&D, &c) is religiously motivated & used for apologetic purposes,
but its proponents
shy away from theological discussion. ...
As to the ID naysayers - I think they could simply answer "Big
deal! Who designed _you_? There's no problem with ID as an explanation
at intermediate levels, as in archaeology. What's problematic is it's
show-stopper role as a final explanation."
Makes sense to me, George. (Sometimes it takes me a little while to
understand your point -- I presume the same is even more true for those
who try to decipher mine!
Burgy (John W. Burgeson)
Imago Dei (who cares where I once earned my living?)
Regular e-mail address is Burgy@Compuserve.com